CrimeCentral.info is the comprehensive directory providing information about crimes, criminal, law enforcement, crime statistics, drunk driving, hate crimes, voting rights, criminal law reform.



Forensic Psychology

Posted by Alan Smith | Forensics | Tuesday 21 April 2009 2:19 am

If you have developed a interest in forensic psychology then you are required to take psychology and criminal justice at the core of your academic studies. As there are not many universities which are offering forensic psychology degree therefore you can also go for a social, criminal investigation, development psychology and clinical degree. These will also help you get prepared to pursue a career or specialize in forensic psychology. You might as well go for some top accredited online universities as they might be offering online degree in forensic psychology.

Forensic psychology is further divided into:

• Development

• Cognitive

• Clinical forensic psychology

• Criminal investigation

As a criminal psychologist your work will be to bring together and relate psychology to criminal justice. Usually people get confused between forensic psychology and forensic science. They might sound similar but are quite different.

Being a forensic psychologist you will be required to immerse your self in the case. Studying the pattern or reasons behind it and applying psychological laws to figure out the cause behind that crime. Some frequent cases that you might come across with being a forensic psychologist will be:

• Was he forced to do so?

• Is he mentally ill??

• Was the crime performed because of excess of alcohol?

Some time people commit crime without having the intention to do so. A forensic psychologist studies the various aspects behind it. People commit crimes out of fear or they could be mentally ill. In that case they might not be referred at guilty.

You can work with the police or help selecting the jury. The job of a forensic psychologist revolves around a lot. You will always have something good and different to try your hands at.

Law Enforcement in Todays Society

Posted by Aneka Tony | Law Enforcement | Monday 13 April 2009 6:51 am

It wasn’t too long ago that you could be a police officer by getting hired. The training consisted of whatever your department considered important enough to train you on. You field training program also depended on what the department figured was necessary. Some older officers tell that when they started, they were given a badge, gun, uniform, leather, a flashlight, a map and a law book. They were then told to hit the streets and if they needed help, to call the chief at home. This was even before cell phones were around so to call the chief took a stop at a pay phone and a lot of praying that you wouldn’t get more than you could handle. This has all changed now. There are the various police academies, college classes and field training programs that can go for 4-52 weeks depending on the department. If you worked in a small department you could go years without a serious offense such as a homicide call, a rape or even an armed robbery. By then, common sense should come in to play.

There are a lot of really good, caring officers that do a great job, but we still have too many that “the thin blue line” protects when they shouldn’t. Too many states can still seal the file of an officer investigation and this usually means that they resign their position and keep their mouth shut. This saves the embarrassment and even a possible arrest. What this does though, is allow the bad cop to move on and apply for a position in another department or even state. This problem is not unique to law enforcement. It happens in almost every profession even though it does happen less than it used to. In Florida for example, nothing is supposed to be hidden. The laws are supposed to be followed that make any investigation public record once the investigation is completed and charges are filed or decided against. This is kind of a double edged sword. A good officer that does his or her job can have a concerted effort against him or her in an attempt to remove the officer. It doesn’t matter how good or honest an officer is, if he or she gets 15 complaints in one month for the same problem, such as excessive force, the officer will look bad no matter if he or she is cleared of the charges. It should be noted that this can happen to the citizen too. That is why it is my opinion that is you are charged with a crime and found not guilty, the charge should be immediately removed from the persons criminal history.

How do we fix this? First, every officer investigated should have the same rights as a regular citizen. He or she should have the right to face their accuser. All complaints should have to be in writing and notarized. If the investigation is handled in house, the evidence from the investigation should be corroborated by an outside, uninterested party. Finally, if the investigation is proven to be baseless or even worse, a total fabrication, the accuser should suffer the consequences. Just like an officer should be reprimanded or even charged if he or she does that to a citizen, it should be the same penalty for a citizen who is lying just to get attention or to cause an officer grief.

The whole idea of covering up an investigation or hiding it does nothing to establish trust and it certainly doesn’t do justice to all of the good, honest officers that are out their giving their all and doing their best to make a difference.